HS
Huasheng Precision
Dongguan · Est. 2009
Guides / Materials

PEEK vs Ultem —
which premium plastic?

Two engineering thermoplastics at the top of the performance ladder. One costs twice as much as the other. Here's when the premium actually buys you something.

The quick answer

Default to Ultem. It's half the cost, machines well, meets FAA flammability requirements, and handles continuous service temperatures up to 170 °C. It's what's on the inside of most of the aircraft you've flown on.

Step up to PEEK when your application exceeds Ultem on any of these: continuous temperature above 170 °C, repeated steam sterilization cycles above 50, aggressive chemical exposure (especially chlorinated solvents), UHV vacuum cleanliness requirements, or implant-grade biocompatibility specifications.

Temperature — the cleanest decision axis

Temperature is the easiest property to compare. Ultem 1000 maintains mechanical properties to ~170 °C continuous; PEEK 450G maintains properties to ~250 °C continuous. For brief excursions, PEEK tolerates 300 °C+ while Ultem softens and deforms.

If your part sees engine-compartment heat, solder-reflow fixtures, or extended autoclave cycles above 135 °C, PEEK is the right call. For aircraft cabin parts, electrical insulators, and below-the-hood automotive plastics that stay below 150 °C most of the time, Ultem is economically smart.

Side-by-side comparison

Property comparison
PropertyPEEK 450GUltem 1000
Continuous service temp250 °C170 °C
Tensile strength100 MPa85 MPa
Tensile modulus3,600 MPa3,000 MPa
Density1.32 g/cm³1.27 g/cm³
AppearanceOpaque tanTranslucent amber
Autoclave cyclesUnlimited~100
Chemical resistanceExceptionalVery good
FAA FST ratingYesYes
Relative cost2.0×1.0×

Transparency — when Ultem wins

The most overlooked difference between these two is appearance. PEEK is opaque tan — you cannot see into the part. Ultem is translucent amber — you can. For medical devices where visual inspection of internal features (fluid channels, electrical routing, fill levels) matters, Ultem wins by default.

A typical use case: a surgical fluid-management manifold with internal channels. The designer wants visual confirmation that the channels are unobstructed. Machined in PEEK, the manifold is opaque; you'd need to rely on flow testing. Machined in Ultem, you can see channel geometry at a glance. The cost difference is genuinely worth it.

Medical autoclave — when PEEK wins

For medical instruments that see unlimited autoclave cycles across a multi-year service life, PEEK is the right call. Over 1,000 steam cycles, unfilled Ultem gradually becomes brittle and can crack at stress concentrations — we've seen customer returns on Ultem parts that were specified for "autoclavable" applications without clarifying cycle count.

PEEK survives effectively unlimited cycles, which is why implant-grade PEEK (Invibio PEEK-OPTIMA®) became the standard for permanent orthopedic hardware rather than Ultem. For dental and surgical instruments that see daily sterilization over 5–10 year service life, PEEK is worth the premium.

Semiconductor and chemical process applications

Semiconductor wafer handling fixtures and chemical process pump components almost always specify PEEK over Ultem. The driver is chemical resistance, not temperature — chlorinated solvents (TCE, methylene chloride) attack Ultem but leave PEEK untouched. If your fixture will be cleaned with aggressive solvents or handle wafer-etch chemistries, PEEK is the default.

Exception: for fixtures handling only aqueous chemistries and seeing temperatures below 150 °C, Ultem is perfectly adequate and saves meaningful cost.

Aerospace interior — typically Ultem

Most aircraft cabin parts that are visible to passengers — tray tables, overhead bin latches, light lens housings, seat back components — are Ultem. The combination of FAA flammability approval, translucent amber aesthetic that works with cabin lighting, and lower cost makes Ultem the default for visible interior parts.

PEEK shows up in aerospace for structural and engine-adjacent parts: cabling insulators near heat sources, fuel system fittings, and interior structural brackets where fire-safety performance must be exceptional rather than merely adequate.

The decision framework

Start with Ultem 1000. Upgrade to PEEK 450G only if your application requires one of:

  • Continuous service temperature above 170 °C
  • More than 100 steam autoclave cycles over service life
  • Chlorinated solvent exposure or other aggressive chemistries
  • Implant-grade biocompatibility (Invibio PEEK-OPTIMA®)
  • UHV vacuum cleanliness below 10⁻⁸ torr
  • Aerospace structural fire-safety applications

If none of these apply, Ultem will do the job at half the cost, and the translucent appearance may be an advantage rather than a compromise. See the PEEK materials page for implant-grade sourcing detail and PPSU as a cheaper third option for medical applications.

/ FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q01Is PEEK always better than Ultem if cost isn't an issue?+
No. Ultem wins on transparency — if you need to see inside the part (fluid channels, electrical routing), Ultem's amber translucent appearance beats PEEK's opaque tan. Ultem is also slightly easier to machine and bond. For applications below 170 °C continuous service temperature, you lose nothing by choosing Ultem.
Q02Can both be autoclaved?+
PEEK survives steam autoclave indefinitely at 134 °C. Ultem handles ~100 autoclave cycles before showing degradation — it embrittles gradually under repeated steam exposure. For medical devices with unlimited autoclave cycles, PEEK wins. For single-use or limited-cycle devices, Ultem is adequate.
Q03Do both meet FAA flame-retardancy requirements?+
Yes. Both PEEK and Ultem meet FAR 25.853 flame/smoke/toxicity (FST) requirements for aircraft interiors. Ultem is more commonly specified for aircraft interior parts because of its cost advantage and translucent amber color that works with cabin lighting design.
Q04What about PEEK-CF and Ultem with glass fill?+
Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (typically 30% CF) gives ~2× the stiffness of unfilled PEEK with better wear resistance — aerospace structural and oil-field applications. Ultem is commonly glass-filled (10–40% GF) for applications needing stiffer dimensional stability. Filled grades machine differently and wear tooling faster; we price accordingly.
Q05Which chemical resistance is better?+
PEEK is essentially unattackable by any common industrial chemical — acids, bases, chlorinated solvents, aromatics. Ultem resists most solvents but is attacked by chlorinated hydrocarbons (methylene chloride, trichloroethylene). For semiconductor tool fixtures handling aggressive chemistries, PEEK is usually specified even where Ultem's thermal limits would be fine.
Q06What about PPSU as a third option?+
PPSU (Radel R-5500) sits one step below PEEK and Ultem on cost and performance. It autoclaves well, has good impact resistance, and costs about a third of PEEK. For medical device parts that don't need PEEK's extreme performance, PPSU is often the smart choice. See our PEEK materials page for detailed PPSU comparison.
Start a project

Need PEEK or Ultem parts?

Send your STEP file. We'll quote in both and explain which one is the right call for your specific application.